Freebirthing Profiled in Washington Post – Updated
The Washington Post has a fairly lengthy piece on unassisted home birth, or “freebirthing” – typically delivery at home with only family members present, but no docs, midwives, or medical interventions.
To Rothman, the nurse-midwife, Shanley’s [author of Unassisted Childbirth] beliefs underscore a more fundamental problem with maternity care. “To me the really interesting question is, Why would someone go outside the system?” Rothman said. “What is so broken that they don’t want to use it?”
I’ll have more commentary on this later, but wanted to go ahead and throw the link up for your perusal. Try BugMeNot if you have trouble with the registration.
Updates:
Womon and Sprout has an interesting response to the Washington Post piece, and further discussion is happening on the Mothering discussion board. There is also a Q&A transcript from the Washington Post.
The bit of the WP article I’m least fond of:
“Obviously women are adults and can make their own decisions, but do they really understand what the risks are?” asked Kilpatrick [chair of the OB-GYN department at the University of Illinois at Chicago and the committee on obstetric practice for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Nice assumption that women are going to this completely uninformed. Although I’m sure freebirthing isn’t for every woman and every pregnancy, from what I’ve read, the women who are choosing this are choosing it because they are informed, because they know what happens in a standard hospital birth and don’t want to participate in that process. Does it sound like Kilpatrick thinks of these women as “adults who can make their own decisions?”
Rothman, a spokeswoman for the American College of Nurse-Midwives, was interviewed for the story and said, “For a healthy woman, the overwhelming likelihood is that unassisted birth will be fine. But a woman having a baby is not in a position to be monitoring herself.”
It would have been nice if Rothman had explained why a woman is “not in a position to be monitoring herself.” What are the barriers to monitoring one’s self or having a spouse or partner do it? Rothman provides no explanation of what could specifically go wrong monitoring-wise, or the WP didn’t include it. Simply telling women, “No, no, sweetheart, we don’t do that,” does nothing to improve safety for those women who prefer a less medicalized birth, and convinces nobody.
The article reports that “Of the 4.1 million babies born in the United States in 2004, the National Center for Health Statistics reports that more than 7,000 were born at home without a midwife or physician.” It does not, however, seem to provide statistics on how many of those resulted in neonatal or maternal death as compared with attended home births or hospital births. The CDC may have this data, and I’m going to attempt to track it down. It seems like a rather important point of comparison, no?


Sadly, I invite everyone over to the mothering and more. commune thread on unassisted childbirth to peruse the shockingly high proportion of bad outcomes there. I’m a totally holistic homebirth midwife (and I mean that) – and we DO exist (legally, alegally or illegally). If you care enough, you can find us, and most of us are quite happy to sit on the porch with some lemonade and ‘be there’ only when needed. Why are women not in a place to monitor themselves? Because true, natural, uninhibited birth requires that a woman reach the utter “birth zone” – a place far beyond the cerebral cortex. Trust a trustworty another; it’s not such a scary thing.
Pardon me, I meant mothering dot commune – web search for the actual addy.
HBM,
Thank you for your comment, and rationale regarding the monitoring. I really felt that the WP article should have described it more completely, which you have done from your perspective. I’ve browsed that discussion board, but not enough to get a full picture of the experiences women have with UC. I’d really love to hear a variety of perspectives on this issue.
Rachel, I need to say — you are so wonderful. THANK YOU for your intellectual activism. I respect you to no end. I have passed on your blog addy to many others, but wish I could do more.
Thank you very much.
thank you for linking to me. This is a seriously important issue for wimmin and our health choices.
Blessed Be!
Thanks for covering this and not treating women who go outside the system as idiots or reckless. I do agree that there are too many bad outcomes for me to endorse unassisted birth. But, frankly, I feel that way about birth with a high degree of interventions, also.
Thank you, Rachel. I haven’t read many of the discussions about the article because so many of the people posting are judgmental. For the most part I was disappointed in the article. I spoke with the reporter for an hour on the phone and honestly felt she would take a more positive approach to the subject. It was discouraging to see my comments to her reduced to a few sentences. But of course this is a mainstream newspaper. I was thankful to be given the opportunity to participate in the online discussion.
To homebirthmidwife, I disagree with you about the mothering message board. I have been a member for many years, and rarely do the women on the board have problems. As far as the “birth zone” you refer to being difficult to reach, this simply isn’t true, or at least it wasn’t for me. It was no more difficult for me to reach than the “sex zone” or the “sleep zone.” I simply relaxed and allowed my body to give birth, in its own time and in its own way. Birth is a natural bodily function. Sadly most women have been convinced that it’s a deep, dark, dangerous medical event that must be managed, controlled and directed by someone other than the mother.
Laura Shanley
Laura,
Thank you for your comment. Although unassisted childbirth may not be right for every situation, I’m glad to see coverage of it generating discussion about the problems of the hospital birth process, a process that treats all women as identical machines. As you and homebirthmidwife illustrate, birth and beliefs about birth can be quite different for different women.
The bottom line is that women are becoming more educated and searching for choices. Cross reference information regarding birth. Doctors should not trash midwives and midwives should not trash unassisted birthers. As part of the human race, we should be open to individuals making informed choice and support each other. The midwives who are critical of my work do not understand that for every media coverage on unassisted homebirth, more women are actually considering homebirths with a midwife! Most people are not willing or interested in birthing completely in the absence of a skilled caregiver.
I gave birth to 4 babies in the hospital and then researched my way to unassisted homebirth. My 2 unassisted homebirths were very logical choices for my situation: short labors, very minimal pain and pushing stages, no need or desire for drugs, comfort with my body. I was inspired to create a CD for all women in the childbearing years. Please visit my website for more info.
Unassisted homebirth is gaining momentum in the news and I expect 2008 to be a phenomenal year of exposing this very important topic.
-Lynn M. Griesemer
author of UNASSISTED HOMEBIRTH: AN ACT OF LOVE(1998) and YOUR BODY, YOUR BIRTH: SECRETS FOR A SATISFYING AND SUCCESSFUL BIRTH (2007)
http://www.unassistedhomebirth.com
http://www.yourbodyyourbirth.org