Skip to content

Pelvic Exams and Informed Consent

March 3, 2007

The New England Journal of Medicine has a perspective piece by Adam Wolfberg in the current issue (1), “The Patient as Ally — Learning the Pelvic Examination,” which addresses the issue of teaching pelvic examinations to medical students. It provides some telling information about the history of how this exam was taught, stating, “in contrast to ambulatory care, the gynecologic operating room has historically provided medical students with an opportunity to learn this exam: they could perform it in anesthetized patients immediately before surgery.” This practice became extraordinarily controversial when it became more widely known that pelvic exams were often performed on anesthesized surgical patients without their knowledge or consent, as a teaching tool rather than for medical care. According to the piece, “Academic gynecologists were accused of using patients as unwitting “training dummies” — a reaction exacerbated by the report’s revelation that students who had completed an Ob/Gyn clerkship were less likely than other students to believe it is important to obtain the patient’s consent for such an exam.”

The study cited (2) found that only 51% of those who had completed an OB/GYN clerkship thought consent prior to pelvic exam was “very” or “somewhat” important – 24% were “neutral,” 15% found consent to be “somewhat unimportant,” and 9% thought consent was “very unimportant.” Those who had not done an OB/GYN clerkship were only somewhat better on the issue of consent, with just 70% stating it was “very” or “somewhat” important – still far short of the 100% consent women might reasonably expect. Interestingly, the survey was conducted in 1995, but this paper reporting the results wasn’t submitted until 2002 or published until 2003. Women familiar with the practice of performing pelvic exams without consent may assume it happened “a long time ago,” but these findings suggest otherwise.

Wolfberg provides disturbing insight into how complaints about this practice are perceived by physicians. Regarding the distinction made by those opposed to the practice who insist that the patient’s consent is absolutely necessary for procedures done solely as a teaching tool, the author states, “This stance rankles physicians who downplay this distinction — particularly those who are uncomfortable asking their patients to give written permission for a medical student to perform an operating-room examination. Patients, they argue, are already nervous about surgery, especially when they must sign the surgical consent form describing everything that can go wrong; the last thing they want at that point is to be asked to allow a medical student to examine them.” This paternalistic attitude is extremely troubling, a sign that some physicians think women shouldn’t have to worry their pretty little heads about what might be done to them without their knowledge while they’re knocked out in a hospital. Rather than coming to the conclusion that the exam should then not be performed without explicit consent from women, individuals and institutions have in the past jumped to the conclusion that they simply shouldn’t ask or tell when violating women’s vaginas.

In response to the controversy, Wolfberg explains, many medical schools have clarified their policies, banned this activity, and switched to teaching the exam with a paid live volunteer or with technological device (such as the Pelvic ExamSIM, a ~$19,000 device), which may not reflect the full range of women’s anatomy and experience of the pelvic exam. Others have decided that a fully informed consent approach might actually work – contrary to physicians’ fears that women would refuse to be examined for teaching purposes, one OB/GYN residency director found (3) that “more than 80% of patients agreed to let a student examine them in the office if they were asked in advance and didn’t feel that they were being pressured.

Citations:
1) Wolfberg AJ. The patient as ally–learning the pelvic examination. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 1;356(9):889-90. [Extract – 1st 100 words]
2) Ubel PA, Jepson C, Silver-Isenstadt A. Don’t ask, don’t tell: a change in medical student attitudes after obstetrics/gynecology clerkships toward seeking consent for pelvic examinations on an anesthetized patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Feb;188(2):575-9. [Full-text]
3) Berry RE Jr, O’dell K, Meyer BA, Purwono U. Obtaining patient permission for student participation in obstetric-gynecologic outpatient visits: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;189(3):634-8. [Full-text]

About these ads
5 Comments leave one →
  1. dustystar permalink
    March 4, 2007 4:09 pm

    This performing pelvic exams on female patients without their consent or knowledge is appalling!
    In addition, what benefit is their to a medical student learning on someone who is completely relaxed and unaware? Better to learn on patients who are awake and nervous as those are the ones they will have to perform most pelvic exams on anyway.
    Also, it is time that phyysicians learned how to perform a SENSTIVE PELVIC EXAM ON ALL WOMEN. Pelvic exams can be traumatic for women with a history of abuse. Do med students learn how to perform sensitive exams on this large segment of the population? Probably not.
    If they want to learn more on this issue, they should check out one web site researched and put together by health care providers that addresses this issue: http://www.cwhn.ca/resources/csa/faq1.html

  2. SNM permalink
    March 8, 2007 6:10 pm

    This seems so strange to me, actually. I’ve heard about this practice being used in medical schools, but I thought it had been outlawed ages ago. I’m a student and I do pelvic exams on *conscious* women *with* their consent all the time. All you have to do is introduce yourself as a student, ask her if it’s okay if you do an exam after your preceptor has checked her, and most women are very willing to allow it, even during labor…even when they’re in a lot of pain. There has only been one or two times in my entire career so far where a patient has requested that I NOT do an exam on her, and we complied. It’s really that easy.

    The above points about learning how to do a sensitive pelvic exam are also very valid. Pelvic exams during labor hurt! How is a student supposed to learn how to be gentle if he/she is always practicing on unconscious women? Sheesh.

  3. Dave permalink
    March 11, 2007 8:00 am

    In theory this no longer happens in the UK as it was meant to have been mad a requirment years ago that consent is obtained before any intimate examinations by trainees.

    In 2003, the BBC reported that this policy was not being followed, so I’m not assuming they are following it now.
    (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2642861.stm).
    The reason this stopped was they got caught. There was no investigation to find out how far spread this abuse was (I cant call it anything else) and it would seem patients were not told. This means if you went through Bristol and other teaching hospitals, you may have been sexually assaulted or may not have.

  4. Anonymous permalink
    March 11, 2007 8:00 am

    I’m not sure I really understand getting all het up over pelvics while not caring in the slightest about breasts or any of the other stuff medical students are told to examine for pathology whenever the patient has something relevant. And of course there is always the surefire way to avoid the situation entirely: go to a private practice doctor.

    The “approval numbers” for students when patients are asked are quite misleading. It’s more like 100% for women and 25% for men, if that (and I’ve seen this quite a bit). Now personally I couldn’t care less because doing pelvics sucks, but you’re getting a generation of ER docs and others who can’t detect OB/GYN pathology properly. Ah well, price of progress I suppose.

  5. Rachel permalink
    March 11, 2007 8:06 am

    Anonymous,
    It’s an issue of informed consent and violation of women’s rights and bodies. I don’t think it’s appropriate to handle the situation by simply telling women to try other (private practice) doctors in hopes that this sort of thing won’t happen. Many women in the U.S. live in areas where there is a limited choice of providers – the only hospital that does their surgery may be a teaching hospital. Legally and ethically, the burden is on the physicians to obtain consent for what they do, not the patient.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,102 other followers

%d bloggers like this: